| |
NASA's Ares Rockets
Metal has no DNA; machines have no genes. But that doesn't mean
they don't have pedigrees — ancestral lines every bit as elaborate
as our own. That's surely the case with the Ares 1 rocket. The best
and smartest and coolest thing built in 2009 — a machine that
can launch human beings to cosmic destinations we'd never considered
before — is the fruit of a very old family tree, one with
branches grand, historic and even wicked.
There are a lot of reasons astronauts haven't moved beyond the harbor
lights of low-Earth orbit in nearly 40 years, but one of them is
that we haven't had the machines to take us anywhere else. The space
shuttle is a flying truck: fine for the lunch-bucket work of hauling
cargo a couple of hundred miles into space, but nothing more. In
2004, however, the U.S. committed itself to sending astronauts back
to the moon and later to Mars, and for that, you need something
new and nifty for them to fly. The answer is the Ares 1, which had
its first unmanned flight on Oct. 28 and dazzled even the skeptics.
From a distance, the rocket is unprepossessing — a slender
white stalk that looks almost as if it would twang in the Florida
wind. But up close, it's huge: about 327 ft. (100 m) tall, or the
biggest thing the U.S. has launched since the 363-ft. (111 m) Saturn
V moon rockets of the early 1970s. Its first stage is a souped-up
version of one of the shuttle's solid-fuel rockets; its top stage
is a similarly muscled-up model of the Saturn's massive J2 engines.
If that general body plan doesn't exactly break ground, that's the
point. NASA tried breaking ground with the shuttles and in doing
so broke all the rules. Shuttle astronauts sit alongside the fuel
— next to the exploding motor that claimed Challenger, beneath
the chunks of falling foam that killed Columbia. And when you fly
a spacecraft repeatedly as opposed to chucking it after a single
use, there's a lot of wear to repair.
When NASA engineers gathered to plan the next generation of America's
rockets, they thus decided to go back to the future — way
back. The Saturn V was the brainchild of Wernher von Braun, the
German scientist whose bright genius gave the U.S. its finest line
of rockets — and whose dark genius gave Hitler the V2 missile
that rained terror on London. Von Braun had, in turn, drawn insights
from American rocket pioneer Robert Goddard. Goddard built on the
work of 17th century artillery innovator Kazimierz Siemienowicz,
a Pole.
The Ares 1 is a worthy descendant of their rockets and others, with
lightweight composites, better engines and exponentially improved
computers giving it more reliability and power. The Ares 1 will
launch an Apollo-like spacecraft with four crew members —
perhaps by 2015. Alongside it, NASA is developing the Brobdingnagian
Ares V, a 380-ft. (116 m) behemoth intended to put such heavy equipment
as a lunar lander in Earth orbit, where astronauts can link up with
it before blasting away to the moon. Somewhere between the two rockets
is the so-called Ares Lite — a heavy-lift hybrid that could
carry both humans and cargo and is intended to be a design that
engineers can have in their back pockets if the two-booster plan
proves unaffordable.
The new rockets could take astronauts to some thrilling places.
The biggest costs — and risks — associated with visiting
other celestial bodies are from landing and taking off again. But
suppose you don't land? An independent commission appointed by the
White House to make recommendations for NASA's future recently returned
its 154-page report and made strong arguments for bypassing the
familiar boots-in-the-soil scenario in favor of a flexible path
of flybys and orbits.
Under the new thinking, astronauts could barnstorm or circle the
moon, Mars and Mars' twin moons, deploying probes to do their rock-collecting
and experiments for them. They could similarly sample near-Earth
objects like asteroids. They could also travel to what is known
as the Lagrange points — a scattering of spots between Earth
and the moon and Earth and the sun where the gravitational forces
on the bodies are precisely balanced and spacecraft simply ... hang
where they are. These would serve as ideal spots for deploying probes
and conducting cosmic observations.
Troublingly for Ares partisans, the same commission that called
for such creative uses for the new rockets also called into question
how affordable they are, arguing that it might be better simply
to modify boosters now used to carry satellites and put a capsule
on top. Maybe — but there's the question of safety too. NASA
designers say the Ares line will be 10 times as safe as the shuttle
and two to three times as safe as competing boosters.
There's no way of knowing if those projections are too rosy, but
if history teaches us anything, it's that the space program's grimmest
chapters — the launchpad fires and shuttle disasters —
unfold when policy planners lean too hard on engineers. The finest
moments occur when the bureaucrats give the designers a clean sheet
of drafting paper and let them dream. There's genius in knowing
how to create a truly big invention — and there's wisdom in
knowing how to recognize it and use it.
SEO Pakistan | SEO
Karachi | SEO Dubai
| SEO UK | SEO
USA | SEO Canada | SEO
Australia | SEO Africa
|
|
